Pictute: A pixel art concept of a private jet carve through the Alpine sky, landing in Davos.
Table of Contents
A jet-fuelled sermon on sustainability
Picture this: private jets carve through the Alpine sky, landing in Davos as Klaus Schwab steps up to preach climate doom. The World Economic Forum (WEF) wants you to believe they’re saving the planet from climate change. Yet a growing crowd smells a rat—or worse, what critics call a “climate change scum” narrative. What does “scum” mean here? It’s the whiff of hypocrisy, profiteering, and control masquerading as environmental virtue. Let’s peel back the layers.
The WEF’s tale is polished: Earth’s on the brink. Temperatures have risen 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, per the IPCC’s 2021 report, and CO2 emissions—led by industrial giants like China—keep soaring. Floods, wildfires, and melting ice caps signal trouble. Their fix? A top-down overhaul dubbed the “Great Reset,” with carbon taxes, net-zero targets, and global partnerships. It’s sold as survival, but the small print hints at something else.
The control conundrum
Start with their darling: “stakeholder capitalism.” It’s pitched as businesses, governments, and NGOs teaming up for the greater good. Lovely—until you see who’s at the table. WEF partners like BlackRock, managing £7.5 trillion per its 2024 filings, push policies like the EU’s Green Deal, a £750 billion climate package that channels money to connected firms. Critics call it a Trojan horse for centralised power, where unelected elites call the shots while small businesses drown in bureaucracy.
Then there’s the “you’ll own nothing and be happy” vision from their 2030 forecast. It’s not a climate solution—it’s a social engineering pitch. The WEF says it’s about sustainability; sceptics say it’s about stripping autonomy. Why does every green fix seem to tighten their grip?
Hypocrisy at 30,000 feet
The Davos lot don’t help their case. At recent summits, hundreds of private jets ferried attendees to the Swiss Alps, with a 170% spike in flights reported by Euronews for 2025, leaving a carbon footprint that’d make a coal plant blush. If climate’s the crisis, why not Zoom? The vibe screams “rules for thee, but not for me”—a hypocrisy that fuels the “scum” label. Beyond the optics, the money trail tells another story.
Following the green money trail
Green initiatives are a goldmine—renewables alone hit £1.3 trillion in 2023, per BloombergNEF. WEF affiliates like BlackRock profit handsomely, steering investments into ESG portfolios while smaller players get priced out. Carbon taxes, a WEF favourite, rake in billions—France’s 2018 tax hit £37 per tonne, says the OECD—but hit hardest at the bottom. A 2021 Tax Foundation study found such taxes can eat up 2.5% of low-income budgets versus 0.8% for the rich. It’s redistribution upwards, cloaked in eco-piety.
The WEF’s defenders might argue it’s about survival, not greed—someone’s got to fund the transition. But when the same elites jetting to Davos pocket the proceeds, the sincerity wears thin.
Weaponising science, silencing doubt
The science isn’t the fight—CO2 warms the planet; that’s settled. But the WEF leans into worst-case models, branding dissent as denialism. Take Judith Curry, a climatologist who’s challenged IPCC alarmism in her 2017 Senate testimony, or Richard Lindzen, whose critiques of climate sensitivity get buried. Both are sidelined, not refuted. Questioning the WEF’s agenda isn’t rejecting thermometers—it’s asking why their solutions always mean more control for them, less freedom for us.
Selective guilt and global games
Culturally, it’s a guilt trip aimed at the West. We’re told to atone for industrialisation while China, pumping out 30% of global emissions (Global Carbon Project, 2023), builds coal plants—over 300 since 2010, per CREA/GEM’s 2023 analysis. The WEF praises China’s “green leadership” (e.g., their 2021 Forum remarks), yet sidesteps the coal elephant. It’s selective morality, less about emissions and more about politics. Toss in flirtations with digital IDs tied to “sustainable behaviour”—a WEF-backed pilot ran in Denmark, 2022, per their own reports—and you’ve got a dystopian whiff.
Credit: CREA Center for research on Energy and Clean Air
Not a hoax, but a hustle?
Is it a scam? Not in the tin-foil sense—no one’s faking the heatwaves. Climate change is real. But the “scum” tag sticks because the WEF’s narrative feels like a hustle wrapped in green branding. They’re not wrong about the problem—they’re just suspiciously keen to be the solution, and to profit from it. For every earnest tree-hugger nodding along, there’s a farmer or lorry driver wondering why they’re stuck with the bill while Davos sips champagne.
Who’s accountable?
Here’s the rub: the WEF answers to no one. No elections, no voters—just a self-congratulatory club with slick PR. They’d say they’re sparking dialogue, not dictating policy. Yet their influence—shaping G20 talks, corporate boards, even your energy bill—is undeniable. Maybe the planet needs saving, but handing the wheel to this crew feels less like rescue and more like a rigged game.
Next time they unveil a climate manifesto, ask: who’s really getting reset? The Earth, or us? Want to dig deeper into climate change debates and environmental controversies? Check out more stories in our Science & Environment category. We’ve pulled numbers and insights from the likes of the IPCC, BloombergNEF, and others—see for yourself.